Video: Understanding the Difference Between Water Efficiency and Water Conservation.
These two terms are often used interchangeably, as if they mean the same thing.
In this short, two-minute video, Klaus Reichardt, CEO and Founder of Waterless Company, Inc., clarifies the difference between these two terms.
During the pandemic, we learned several good restroom habits that kept us healthy.
However, public health officials are concerned that many of these protective measures are now being tossed out the window.
“Even when restroom surfaces look clean, they may be little more than a Petri dish,” says Klaus Reichardt, CEO and Founder of Waterless Co., Inc. marketers of no-water urinals. “With so many surfaces, counters, knobs, and handles in public restrooms, it’s hard not to come in contact with surface contaminants.”
Making matters worse, toilet and urinal plume – the releasing of germs and bacteria into the air when toilets or urinals are flushed –continually adds germs and bacteria on to surfaces. While not a concern when no-water urinals are installed, most all toilets release plumes.
To help protect ourselves, Reichardt suggests we do the following:
Don’t be shy about gathering a paper towel when you enter a public restroom. Use it to cover your hands, so you don’t touch any restroom surfaces or fixtures.
Be quick. Do what needs to be done, wash your hands, and be out the door as soon as possible. The longer you linger in a restroom, the more chances you encounter pathogens.
Wearing a mask in a public restroom is optional, but still a good idea. Not only is toilet plume a problem, but when people gather in public restrooms, they are more likely to sneeze and cough, potentially spreading germs.
A Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease study found that mobile phones are a hotbed for bacteria, viruses, and fungi. One key reason: they are used while people are using the toilet. 1
Instead of tossing used paper towels, use them when you exit the restroom.
“Finally, see something, say something,” adds Reichardt. “If the restroom needs cleaning attention, tell someone in charge. What you are doing is helping to keep others healthy.”
###
1. Mobile phones represent a pathway for microbial transmission: A scoping review
About Waterless
Waterless Co. Inc. has established a well-respected reputation as being an innovative manufacturer of no-water urinal systems. Based in Vista, Ca, the nearly 33-year-old company is the oldest manufacturer of waterless urinals in North America. The company offers a full line of Waterless No-Flush urinals, cleaning liquids, and cost saving accessories. Visit: www.waterless.com
Waterless Co. Inc.
1050 Joshua Way
Vista, CA 92081 USA
800.244.6364
The following is based on an article in How Stuff Works by Matt Sailor. The author uses quotes throughout the article from Klaus Reichardt, CEO and founder of Waterless Co., Inc.
Waterless urinals are growing in popularity because they help building owners and managers reduce water consumption, become more sustainability focused, and lower operating costs.
But how they work is often viewed as a mystery. Let’s put that mystery aside. Here is how they work:
Waterless urinals are typically designed like traditional urinals.
The urine flows down the urinal into a small cylinder – or trap – placed at the bottom of the urinal bowl.
This trap serves many purposes, including blocking sewer odors from being released into the restroom. But for now, we want to focus on the trap temporarily holding the urine.
Inside the trap is a sealant that is lighter than water. This is what prevents sewer odors from being released.
As the urine accumulates in the trap and more men use the urinals, the urine flows into the drainage line below the urinal, just like a traditional urinal.
The process allows the urine to drain naturally. No water is needed in the process – which is why they call them waterless urinals.
The history of waterless urinals dates to the late-1800s. They were first installed in major European cities in park areas and in sidewalk restrooms. However, it was not until 1991 that they were introduced in the United States. Waterless Co., Inc. introduced them, making Waterless Co. Inc. the first marketer of waterless urinals in North America.
How much water they save depends on what type of traditional urinal they are replacing. They often replace older urinals that consume as much as 3 gallons of water per flush (gpf). In such cases, the water savings are very significant.
However, today, they are also replacing newer urinals that use about 1 gpf or less. Usually this happens because these facilities want to go a step further in reducing water consumption. But there is also a cost factor. Waterless urinals require less plumbing, reducing the time and money required to install them.
We must answer: it all depends. In most cases, they can save as much as 20,000 to 35,000 gallons of water per urinal per year. If one office building has 50 waterless urinals installed, that amounts to 1 million to 1.75 million gallons of water per year.
These estimates are based on a building with 50 or more men using the urinal at least three times per day.
Waterless urinals are also growing in popularity in homes and can save water and money there as well. One waterless urinal installed in a home can save about 3,250 gallons of water per year.
How much money this can save a homeowner varies. It depends on how much consumers are charged for water. However, some savings estimates range from about $250 per urinal to as much as $500 per urinal per year.
Finally, we must add that waterless urinals, like flushed urinals, do cost money to maintain and operate. However, operating costs are about 1/3 of operating a flushed urinal, especially because water and sewer rates keep increasing.
With a urinal from Waterless Co., the trap mentioned earlier can last three to six months, depending on use. These traps cost about $9 to replace. With no-water urinals from other manufacturers, the trap lasts only two to three months and, interestingly, can cost $25 or more.
This means due diligence is necessary when selecting waterless urinals. A little research gets increased water savings and greater cost savings as well.
Like to learn more? Contact us at info@waterless.com
Something unusual — but expected — is happening to the conifer forests that blanket large parts of California’s Sierra Nevada. Conifer trees are large, evergreen trees such as spruce, sugar pine, and Douglas fir — all of which typically produce cones.
What’s happening, and why these areas are now being referred to as zombie forests, is that while the older, well-established trees remain strong, few young trees have been able to take root and grow. The climate is now too warm and too dry for them to survive. This is true even though these areas are currently receiving large amounts of precipitation.
A climate mismatch has evolved, and scientists say that based on photographs and survey data, they’ve been expecting this for nearly a century. The situation has been gradually evolving since about the mid-1930s, long before talk of climate change. However, the growth of zombie forests has accelerated in the past two decades, primarily due to climate change.
Today, it is estimated that about 11 percent of the conifer forests are mismatched to their current climate conditions, with another 8 percent “severely” mismatched.
The big concern is what happens should there be a significant disturbance, such as a wildfire, logging disruptions, or mudslides, as is currently happening.
Historically, trees would grow back. Eventually, the forest would return.
But now, instead of trees, we can expect much smaller, shrub-like vegetation that can adapt to warmer and dryer climates.
If we take a broader look at this situation, we see that a mismatch of climate conditions is happening to not only these trees but virtually all living things. Polar bears, for instance, which have inhabited the same areas in the arctic for centuries, are now moving to higher ground to find food. The same movement to new locations is true with other forms of wildlife as well as marine life. The climate these animals initially thrived in is no longer the same, forcing them to literally find greener pastures.
However, even the older conifers that have managed to survive this climate mismatch may need help in the future. With warmer weather comes insects and diseases these trees have never encountered before. How well the trees survive these invasions are still being determined, but some are expected not to make it.
So, what’s the big picture here? Why are zombie forests in California important to all of us?
The first concern is that we may lose one of the main contributions trees make to our planet, absorbing carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases and releasing oxygen through the process of photosynthesis.
A typical mature tree can take in up to about 22 kilograms of CO2 from the atmosphere and convert it into oxygen as well as food, allowing other trees and vegetation in the forests to grow.
Trees also improve water quality in forested areas, slowing rainwater as it falls to the earth so that it can be more thoroughly absorbed. Without this buffer, the rainwater would cause runoff, soil erosion, floods, and pollution in rivers, lakes, and streams.
This would also negatively impact the water we drink. As U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said, “While most Americans live in urban areas, most of us depend on rural lands, particularly forest lands, for clean water and a healthy climate.”
One of the first things we can do is to start by installing the most water efficient plumbing fixtures possible, such as waterless urinals. Further, whenever a waterless urinal is installed, it reminds restroom users that we must use water responsibly and efficiently.
Zombie forests are created by a planet that is becoming warmer and dryer. Let’s view zombie forests and the installation of waterless urinals as one more heads-up that we need to protect our most precious resource now and for the future.
As this is being written, parts of California are still getting substantial rainfall. A blizzard is even forecasted for Southern California.
This is a historical event. The last time Southern California experienced blizzard conditions was in 1989.
California has experienced very unusual weather over the past two years. The last few months of December 2022 were extraordinary because the state received so much rainfall in such a fleeting period. And now a blizzard in an area of the country where the average year-round temperature is in the 60s and 70s? Unthinkable.
What climate experts are saying is that this is another example of climate change impacting Southern California. Wild swings of very dry weather, lasting for years, and now several months of very wet weather.
The reality is that California should enjoy it while it lasts. Long-term predictions are that the state and much of the Southwest and other areas of the country will return to what has been evolving for several years, and that is aridification.
So, we are all on the same page, aridification can be defined as a process in which a region, state, or entire country becomes increasingly dry. It's happening around the globe.
And because it's happening around the globe, we all must become more familiar with it, even if we don't live in areas currently experiencing aridification.
Crops. Invariably, the first signs of aridification are that crops that grow in a region are no longer receiving sufficient irrigation to grow.
Economics. Farming communities soon begin to suffer economically when they cannot grow crops. They soon need help feeding their livestock as well as themselves.
Inflation. Food is a core commodity. When the supply of food is reduced, costs go up. This will apply not only to fruits and vegetables but meats and chicken. A domino situation sets in. With supplies going down and costs up, scores of other industries are impacted. This raises the prices of all types of goods and services.
Movement. Aridification has been causing people living in farming communities to move to cities. Very often, their skills are not easily transferable to urban living.
Water. With water supplies in shorter demand, water costs go up. Localities must look further for new supplies as old watering holes dry up. They must charge for this.
Conflict. This is a big concern in many parts of the world. This includes conflict between cities, states, and countries. The Middle East has only one percent of the world's freshwater, but it must be shared among five percent of the world’s population. So far, tensions here have been resolved. But will they in the future?
Non-potable. This refers to any water that has not been treated or evaluated to be sure it is safe for human consumption. Aridification is making it harder for millions of people to get safe drinking water.
Poverty. View water as a foundational. If water is in short supply or there is no potable water in a region, poverty is invariably the result. Aridification contributes to world poverty, which is expected to become more of a concern in years to come.
Depletion. Many states in the U.S. no longer depend on rainfall events for their water. Instead, they are draining underground water supplies. The problem is these supplies are drying out and are not being replenished. Where, responsible public officials are asking, will people living in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and parts of Texas get their water five or ten years from now?
Our only option is to use water efficiently or, if possible, not at all. That's what waterless urinals are designed to do. Reduce water consumption dramatically and permanently, so it can be used for drinking water, growing crops, and protecting communities and economies.
We often hear about the impact climate change is having on water, causing some areas of the country to experience prolonged periods of drought while others are experiencing far more moisture than in the past.
But climate change had no role in causing the Dust Bowl. Rather, it was the result of several conditions, incidents, and unfortunate happenings.
Below are some frequently asked questions about the Dust Bowl.
The Dust Bowl brought economic, ecological, and human misery to millions of Americans. It occurred simultaneously with the Great Depression, which added to the economic suffering.
The Dust Bowl was caused by extended drought, unusually hot weather, strong winds, and poor agricultural practices.
Soil erosion along with high winds and choking dust clouds called black blizzards — because they eliminated daytime sunlight — swept through the Midwest, from Nebraska to Texas.
The Dust Bowl started in 1931 and tapered off by 1939.
In 1932, there were 14 black blizzards. By 1933, there were 40.
After World War I and throughout the 1920s, mechanized farming equipment was introduced to allow farmers to grow more crops over more land. This helped increase profits. Previously unplowed land — as much as five million acres — was plowed to produce record crops.
These record crops reached a crescendo during the 1931 season, but due to the Depression, there were few buyers. Farmers let their crops die in the fields, and the over-plowed land was left bare. In time, the fertile topsoil blew away in the winds. Drought made the situation even worse. Eventually, many farmers lost their farms to foreclosures. Their land and any remaining crops were left to turn to dust.
Yes; in 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt enacted programs to help farmers avoid foreclosures to help keep their farms afloat. The administration also set up programs to teach farmers new farming practices to protect their land and begin farming again. However, it was a major undertaking. By 1935, 35 million acres of farmland were ruined, and the topsoil covering more than 100 million acres of land had blown away.
Yes, both humans and animals suffered. The dust storms caused dust pneumonia, which occurs when excessive and prolonged inhalation of dirt and dust results in inflammation of the lungs. Acute respiratory infection is followed by painful and severe symptoms. Fever developed, and many people died of dust pneumonia.
According to the Yale School of the Environment, much has changed in the U.S. heartland, “with improved irrigation and agricultural practices. [But] with rising temperatures and worsening droughts caused by global warming, another Dust Bowl in the U.S. is possible.”
Another concern is that underground water from aquifers is drying up in large parts of the Midwest.
“There comes a point where if you’re not replenishing aquifers, then all you need is the next minor drought to come along, and … you run the risk of another Dust Bowl-like event,” says Tim Cowan, a senior research fellow at the University of Southern Queensland who studies the effects of climate change on precipitation and heat waves.
Yes, it does. Water efficiency means utilizing new and existing technologies such as waterless urinals, which use far less water than traditional products, including no water at all. Water efficiency can and will play a significant role in preventing another Dust Bowl because it helps reduce the amount of water drawn from aquifers, helping them replenish, so we can better manage through another drought when it comes along.
Most of us know what a flash flood is. In late 2022, California and many other areas of the western United States experienced several flash floods that resulted in damaged homes, mudslides, and killed 17 people.
A flash flood, according to NASA, is a rapid rise of water along streams and low-lying land. It typically occurs within six hours of a major rainfall event but can happen even sooner in an intense storm with heavy rain.
Flash droughts are just the opposite, but in many ways, they can be just as damaging. Unlike flash floods, which can develop in hours, flash droughts usually take weeks to months to develop.
But these are not traditional droughts. A drought usually takes years, sometimes a decade, to develop.
The big concern about flash droughts is that communities have little chance to prepare for them. This is unlike the droughts we have seen in the past, where public officials, businesses, and consumers are provided with ample warning signs that drought conditions are growing and becoming more serious.
With a flash drought, there is no warning. In 2017, a flash drought hit Montana and the Dakotas, catching everyone by surprise and causing $3 billion in agricultural losses.
These areas of the country experienced a combination of lower-than-normal precipitation and higher temperatures.
These factors reduced overall land moisture.
Under normal conditions, moisture accumulates from rainfall. Plants draw this water through their roots and release water vapor into the air. This is called transpiration.
But with already dry conditions and higher temperatures in Montana and the Dakotas, there was an increase in evaporation and less transpiration. Vegetation could no longer produce all the moisture the atmosphere demanded.
When this happened, reduced moisture caused surface air temperatures to rise, further drying out the soil. This started a domino effect. The area became increasingly warmer and dryer very quickly, resulting in a flash drought.
Flash droughts are relatively new. The term was coined in the early 2000s to draw more attention to this form of rapid – or intensified – drought conditions. It’s a byproduct of climate change. Rising global temperatures due to climate change are behind flash droughts, according to University of Texas professor Zong-Liang Yang. Climate change contributes to the chain reaction just discussed.
One of the big problems that results from a flash drought is that drought conditions can set in very quickly and unexpectedly. During the first part of 2012, areas in the Midwest received near-normal precipitation through May. But by June, temperatures increased, the area became dryer, and a flash drought occurred by August, causing more than $30 billion in damages.
It’s not easy to predict when or where a flash drought might hit. For instance, in the scenario referenced in Montana and the Dakotas, 2017 started out as a typical year as far as temperatures and precipitation were concerned. But unexpectedly and without warning, it was over in a few months.
Even in the best of situations, scientists say nature can be chaotic, which puts limitations on weather predictions. It’s one reason weather forecasters typically do not make weather predictions beyond ten days. There are just too many variables. Further, climate change is making things worse. Due to climate change, most scientists agree, we must expect the unexpected.
So where does water efficiency come into play? Water efficiency is the long-term reduction in water consumption. Waterless urinals are a perfect example. By reducing the consumption of 35,000 gallons of water per urinal per year, we are saving millions of gallons of water throughout the United States.
By using less water, we are not as vulnerable to flash droughts or traditional droughts. We can move water supplies more quickly to where they are needed. This makes the country more water resilient and agile.
Resilience, agility, and water efficiency are the long-term ways we can minimize the impact of flash droughts.
Sources:
What is a flash drought? An earth scientist explains (waterdesk.org)
https://tinyurl.com/2cbrh37x
Hello! This is Robert Kravitz, and this is the first in our series of interviews with Klaus Reichardt, CEO and founder of Waterless Co., Inc, based in Vista, California.
For those that don't know, Waterless Company was started over 30 years ago. They were the first company to introduce no-water urinals to North America. Today they are referred to as pioneers in water efficiency.
We're calling this series of interviews Waterless Foresights-a Video Series.
Robert:
Hello Klaus, how are you today?
Klaus:
Hi Robert. Great to talk to you and thank you for having me on the show today.
Robert:
Klaus, because you have been involved with water efficiency for more than 30 years, I'm curious about the situation today in the United States regarding water. We got all that rain over the holidays in California. But does that mean we are ahead of the curve now? Are things better now? What is the situation with water today in this country?
Klaus:
That's a particularly good and broad question, and I can start broadly. Water still is the stepchild of so many things.
Every year, thirty to thirty-eight States in our country are under drought watch.
Much of it has to do with the lack of precipitation. But it also has to do with population growth in various areas of the country and the fact that we cannot expand water treatment facilities in certain areas because of environmental concerns. So, a lot of varied factors come into play when we talk about water in this country.
But water issues are finally coming to many more people's awareness. The media is helping make this happen. This was especially true eight years ago in Atlanta, where water for the city was depleted.
Robert:
I just read somewhere that the amount of water in the lake in Salt Lake City is one-third of what it was ten years ago. Making this an even bigger concern is that there are all kinds of sediment at the bottom of the lake where it's dried up. If it becomes windblown, it could prove toxic to the people living in Salt Lake City.
Klaus:
Yes, I have heard that too. If this sediment gets airborne, the masks we wore during COVID won't help much.
This is an extremely hazardous material in the air. Situations like this have happened before. It indicates some of the hazards before us if we don't start using water more efficiently.
You know, there is a difference between conserving water and water efficiency. To conserve water, we can start by just turning the faucet off when we brush our teeth. It can also mean using restroom fixtures, from toilets and urinals to faucets and showerheads, which are designed to use less water.
This is what makes them water efficient.
To become more water efficient, whether at home, in schools, or in the office, we first must become more aware of how much water we use and take steps every day to reduce the amount we use.
Robert:
I noticed you did not mention your own company, Waterless Co. Waterless urinals are now required in some states like Arizona. This is because they eliminate the use of about 35,000 gallons of water per urinal, per year. They help us reduce consumption and use water far more efficiently.
Klaus:
I appreciate you mentioning this. Here's a little example.
In a school, factory, or restaurant restroom, if you can just eliminate the flush urinals and replace them with waterless urinals, you can reduce the amount of water used in that restroom by as much as 30 percent.
Robert:
Wow, I did not know that. That is a major reduction.
Say, this has been a terrific discussion. I look forward to our future talks. Thank you.
We’ve got an absolute climate disaster on our hands here in the United States, and what amazes me is that it still gets only limited attention. No, I’m not talking about the drought in California — I’m talking about Salt Lake City.
The Great Salt Lake is drying up. It’s shrunk by two-thirds since the 1980s. At that time, the lake’s surface covered about 3,300 square miles. Jump ahead to 2022, and it covers less than 1,000 square miles.
Moreover, the lake’s salt content hovered around 9 to 12 percent in the 1980s. Today, it’s reached 17 percent, and herein lies the problem. Such a high salt content threatens the algae in the water, which also threatens the insects and brine shrimp that feed on the algae, and the lives of millions of native and migrating birds that depend on the lake’s water for food and habitat.
But even this isn’t the worst of it. The shrinking lake means more arsenic from the lakebed will be exposed. With high winds and storms, the arsenic will get into the air, threatening the lives of thousands of people living near the lake.
“We have this potential environmental nuclear bomb that’s going to go off if we don’t take some pretty dramatic action,” Joel Ferry, a Republican state lawmaker and lakeside rancher in Utah, told the New York Times.
A situation like this has already existed, but on a smaller scale. In 1913, Owens Lake, located on the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada Mountains in Inyo County, California, was purposely drained into the Los Angeles Aqueduct. Climate change or mother nature played no role.
What happened next is what is feared in Salt Lake City. At the bottom of the Owens lakebed was a morass — a mushy, muddy patch of ground. This morass contained noxious alkalis, carcinogens, arsenic, nickel, and cadmium. As it dried, this toxic mixture was stirred up by periodic winds and inhaled by nearby residents. It was estimated that at one time, as much as four million tons of this dust was in the air. How many people died or were sickened by this, we do not know. However, it was considered a calamity at the time.
Getting back to the Great Salt Lake, what can we do to address this problem? What’s obvious is that the lake needs more water. Just recently, Utah Governor Spencer Cox issued an executive order to use a melting snowpack to help fill the lake. “The Great Salt Lake is crucial to our environment, ecology, and economy, and we must do everything we can to protect it,” the governor said in a written statement.
“We’ve been blessed with a significant snowpack so far this winter, and this executive order will allow the state to move quickly to increase the lake level in the south arm by capturing spring runoff. We don’t want to miss this opportunity to safeguard the lake.”
However, there’s an elephant in the room that the governor and other public officials are trying to ignore. While the governor is happy to report “significant snowpack so far this winter,” the reality is that Utah has been getting less moisture for years and often experiences drought conditions.
“Utah is a semi-arid state, and its water future is one of the most significant challenges facing us today,” according to the Utah Department of Natural Resources. “It is our belief that we will meet the future water needs through a combination of multifaceted solutions that include conservation, efficiency, optimization, agriculture conversion, and water development.”
The key word here is efficiency. Using water efficiently refers to installing low-water-using fixtures and mechanicals that use less water or no water at all compared to traditional ones. The perfect example is waterless urinals, now being installed in Utah and around the country.
Today, we are seeing virtually every manufacturer of water-using products, whether for the home or industry, develop systems that use less water.
This tells me that our future water challenges can be addressed, and water efficiency is the answer.
Two states that have grown dramatically in population since the beginning of the pandemic are Arizona and New Mexico. But today, an unexpected brake is being applied to this growth. New growth typically means new housing, and in both states, there is not enough water to support all the new housing currently under development or planned.
A perfect example is the Teravalis planned community near Phoenix. Planned by the Howard Hughes Corporation to great fanfare, the blueprint calls for building 100,000 homes and 55 million square feet of commercial space. Three hundred thousand people will live in the development, and 450,000 will work there.
Jay Cross, Hughes corporation’s president, assured local business and political leaders that Teravalis “will provide an exceptional quality of life and opportunities for growth.”
While the development has continued, it is facing an array of new challenges it did not expect when it was initially proposed. For instance, Arizona groundwater — where the state gets most of its water — is falling so fast that thousands of wells around the state are already bone dry.
This lack of groundwater has caused another significant housing development, this one in Pinal County, Arizona, also near Phoenix, to halt construction.
According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources, there is insufficient water to support the development because groundwater pumping has exceeded the supply. Making matters worse, the department is unsure if or when there will be enough water for the development to continue.
New Mexico is in the same boat if we can use that term when discussing such arid conditions. One project, Campbell Ranch, proposed building 4,000 homes, a commercial center, and two golf courses governing 8,000 acres.
However, state engineers said the development would require about 400 million to 500 million gallons of groundwater annually. The water is just not there. “It’s fundamental; [you] can’t build that development without water,” said Kathy Freas, a co-founder of a citizens’ group opposed to the Campbell Ranch plan.
Another development, Santolina, was a 14,000-acre development proposed in 2014. In this case, parts of the development have been under construction.
But construction has slowed as the developer looks for more water and new ways to reduce water consumption if and when the development is ever completed. Still, recent reports that it will need 7.3 billion gallons of water per year to serve its projected 90,000 residents have resulted in highly active public opposition.
So, will these two housing developments in New Mexico ever be completed? The first one, Campbell Ranch, looks dead in the water — if there ever was any water. The developers of Santolina are still looking at their options.
As to Teravalis, Arizona has approved a $1 billion, three-year program to secure water supplies for the entire state. But this is considered a drop in the bucket. “Teravalis will be in the making for 50 years, maybe 70 years, until buildout,” says Greg Vogel, CEO of Land Advisors, a development consultancy. “[That’s when] they’ll have enough water.”
So what’s the answer to these and similar situations around the country? It’s the same thing other states and communities around the world are doing. They are finding ways to use water more efficiently, which is the only way to reduce consumption and the amount of groundwater being pumped out of the earth.
Arizona has been a leader in this movement. For instance, the state requires the installation of waterless urinals, saving millions of gallons of water each year. But even with these steps, the problem both Arizona and New Mexico are facing is that they are growing faster than they have water, and there are few options. These new mega-developments will have to be placed on hold until things are balanced out.
Klaus Reichardt is CEO and founder of Waterless Co, Inc, pioneers in advancing water efficiency. Reichardt founded the company in 1991 with the goal of establishing a new market segment in the plumbing fixture industry with water efficiency in mind. Reichardt is a frequent writer and presenter, discussing water conservation issues. He can be reached at klaus@waterless.com
